click to show more information

click to hide/show information About your Search

20130318
20130326
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2 (some duplicates have been removed)
them. >> eric: they have the film. >> bob: they have hidden it some place. >> dana: maybe the f.b.i. has interviewed them. it's strange that it has gone on this long. i understand why people are concerned about it. if you talk to the 33 people you don't get to the key question asking who pushed the video? they had nothing to do with that. they might be upset that the video was used as an excuse and it wasn't true. you have won't find the answer to that with the 32 people. >> andrea: they're afraid that they might say what ambassador's diary said. we asked for help, not just the day but the months that led up to that. i thought the answer was ridiculous. i don't comment on the president's meetings when they asked him, james rosen asked about elsewhere or anywhere? you won't comment? we should hear from them. i don't think it's weird we haven't. it's odd that access by lawmakers to get to them has been stymied. that is a strange thing. why can't members get access to these victims? >> bob: touch on what you mentioned about the e-mails. not one of them has surfaced. so until we see an
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2 (some duplicates have been removed)